Well report No. RR-4421 · T11N · R20W · SEC 23 · filed September 30, 2026

OffshoreWell report

BOEM Closes California Offshore Leasing Comment Window Friday

BOEM's public comment window on proposed California offshore leasing closes Jan. 23. No new federal leases off the state since the mid-1980s; litigation expected.

Field notes

  1. BOEM public comment on proposed California offshore drilling closes Friday, Jan. 23
  2. No new federal leases off California since the mid-1980s, following the 1969 Santa Barbara spill
  3. Ventura County supervisors oppose the plan, citing $2.8 billion in Port of Hueneme economic activity

The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management is accepting public comment on the Trump administration's proposed offshore oil and gas leasing off the California coast only through Friday, Jan. 23, giving stakeholders days rather than weeks to weigh in on a program that would break a four-decade pause on new federal leases in the Pacific.

BOEM opened the comment period following the administration's November announcement that it intends to open new areas to offshore drilling, including waters off California. No lease sale has been held off the state since the mid-1980s. The last major inflection point in California offshore politics remains the 1969 Santa Barbara blowout, which killed wildlife and hardened state opposition to new federal leasing — opposition that has held through every subsequent administration.

Sanctioned nothing yet — appraisal and process stage

Industry readers should note the separation here: nothing is sanctioned, drilled, or even scheduled for sale. What exists today is a federal proposal, a comment docket, and a defined set of legal and political obstacles between the drafting table and any spud date. California's political establishment has already positioned itself on the other side of those obstacles.

Gov. Gavin Newsom, speaking at the UN Climate Summit in Brazil in November 2025, described the leasing plans as "dead on arrival." State legal resistance is expected to mirror the challenges that stalled previous five-year programs.

Charles Lester, director of the Ocean and Coastal Policy Center at UC Santa Barbara, sees the litigation battleground forming around statutory review requirements — specifically whether BOEM has adequately analyzed development near sensitive resources such as the Channel Islands National Marine Sanctuary.

"Those are some of the environmental questions that might come up in the litigation, for example. Have they adequately addressed the requirements to develop near or sensitive resources or account for the possible impacts to those resources in the proposal," Lester said.

Local economic countercurrents

Ventura County, whose waters sit inside the proposed leasing footprint, has moved formally against the plan. The county Board of Supervisors passed a resolution opposing new drilling. Supervisor Vianey Lopez, who represents the 5th District, framed the opposition in economic terms tied to a specific terminal: the Port of Hueneme, which she said generates $2.8 billion in economic activity.

"Anything that affects the coast, anything that could impact the work that they do with ships arriving, imports and exports, that has a significant impact for the county alone on the economic value," Lopez said.

That sets up a familiar California calculus for operators: federal acreage on offer against a state that controls permitting infrastructure, coastal zone consistency reviews, and the political climate around onshore support facilities.

Environmental groups mobilizing comment volume

The Surfrider Foundation, a coastal-advocacy nonprofit, has made the BOEM docket a priority campaign. Zach Plopper, environmental director with the organization and a Ventura resident, called the proposal one of the most consequential fights in the group's 42-year history.

"This is one of the biggest fights in Surfrider's 42 years of protecting our ocean ecosystems and our ability to enjoy these spaces from needless new offshore drilling," Plopper said. "It's going to impact the coast and going to impact our ability to access the coast, and it's going to impact us for generations to come."

Thousands of comments have already been submitted, according to the source report. Comment volume and content will feed the administrative record that courts would review in any subsequent litigation — a point that matters for operators tracking whether a future lease sale can survive challenge.

The White House position

President Donald Trump has framed expanded drilling as economic policy, restating the case in his inaugural address.

"Today I will also declare a national energy emergency. We will drill, baby, drill," Trump said during the 2025 inaugural address.

Watch items

The immediate marker is Friday, Jan. 23: the close of the BOEM public comment window. After that, the sequence to track is the department's next programmatic step — whether it issues a draft proposed program or moves directly toward a lease sale schedule — followed by California's expected legal challenge and any coastal zone consistency disputes. For a basin that has produced no new federal leases since the mid-1980s, the docket closing Friday is the first measurable datapoint in what will be a multi-year process.

via Google News: Offshore drilling and FPSOs (Source)

Filed under

  • offshore-drilling
  • california
  • boem
  • federal-leasing
  • ventura-county
Share this article:

More from Priya Raman

Priya Raman

Show full bio

Senior reporter covering media and advertising at Rig & Refinery.

118 articles

Adjoining reports

« Previous article

BOEM Closes California Offshore Leasing Comment Window Friday — Rig & Refinery