Well report No. RR-4730 · T14N · R34W · SEC 14 · filed October 10, 2026

Midstream & PipelinesWell report

Ottawa Lists 1 MMbpd Pacific Link Pipeline Under Bill C-5

Ottawa formally listed the 1 MMbpd Pacific Link pipeline under Bill C-5, the first project to enter the post-2025 fast-track approval regime. Canada and Alberta hold a combined 90% stake.

Field notes

  1. Pacific Link listed under Building Canada Act on Thursday; first project under Bill C-5 with a 1 MMbpd capacity from Alberta to the West Coast
  2. Canada and Alberta hold 45% each, Pembina 10%; $4 billion initial studies funded by federal and provincial governments
  3. Indigenous communities to be offered a collective stake of at least 10%; 140 consultations held with 110 communities over the summer
  4. Carney values the differential-narrowing opportunity at $6-10 billion per year; Trans Mountain already at capacity
  5. Major Projects Office has 12 months to publish the binding conditions document; Ottawa plans a shipper commitments round before FID

A 1 million bpd crude pipeline from the Alberta oilsands to the British Columbia coast has been formally listed under Canada's Building Canada Act, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Thursday, becoming the first project to enter the fast-tracked approval process created after the 2025 federal election.

The line, now dubbed the Pacific Link, sits inside a one-year clock for the federal Major Projects Office to draft a binding conditions document. That document will replace permits normally required under the Canadian Energy Regulator Act, the Fisheries Act, the Species at Risk Act, the Canada Marine Act and the Canadian Environmental Protection Act.

What capacity does the line target?

At 1 MMbpd, Pacific Link would roughly double Canada's current tidewater export capacity and add a second west coast outlet for oilsands crude. The federal government points to Trans Mountain, now running at capacity, as the demand case for the new line.

The 1 MMbpd throughput also reflects what Ottawa says producers can fill. The designation note says the upstream sector "has sufficient financial capacity to fund a significant share of the required growth," supported by Asian demand.

Carney framed the commercial case in dollar terms. "There's a tremendous commercial opportunity for them, given diversification of markets, given the prospect of narrowing the differential that exists," he told reporters. "That's worth… somewhere between six to $10 billion a year."

Who owns the project, and who pays?

Canada and Alberta each hold a 45% stake in Pacific Link, with Pembina Pipelines carrying the remaining 10%. The federal and provincial governments will fund the $4 billion in initial studies and consultations.

Asked what taxpayers stand to lose if the project stalls, Carney replied: "The Canadian taxpayer is going to make a lot of money off this pipeline."

What conditions sit on the listing?

The Building Canada Act listing sets a 12-month window for the Major Projects Office to finalize binding terms. Ottawa has defined "meaningful" Indigenous ownership as a collective stake of at least 10%.

The Major Projects Office held 140 meetings with 110 communities along the route over the summer. The designation note acknowledges that "the majority of Indigenous communities were not prepared to support project listing based on the information available," but concludes that listing alone will not adversely affect treaty rights.

How much commercial risk remains?

Lance Mortlock, EY Canada's managing partner for energy, sees the designation as a signal but not a guarantee of private capital. "Investors will continue to focus on the project economics, permitting process, Indigenous participation, cost discipline, and long-term demand fundamentals," he said. "Designation improves certainty, but I don't think it eliminates the commercial risk that's still there."

Yrjö Koskinen, director of research at the Institute of Sustainable Finance, urges a slower track. "Let's keep the option open and prudently make the final investment decision only when we know more about the speed of the energy transition, oil demand in Asia, construction costs and shipper commitments," he wrote.

Koskinen points to the May implementation agreement with Alberta, which he links to $34 billion in abnormal shareholder gains for Alberta-based energy companies, as evidence the project has value but also faces exposure if sentiment shifts before construction.

NDP leader Avi Lewis called the designation "a gift to an oil industry already on track to make $100 billion in wartime profits this year alone."

What comes next?

Ottawa plans a bidding process to test shipper commitments before reaching a final investment decision. Other projects in the queue for designation include the Northwest Territories' Mackenzie Valley Highway, the Roberts Bank Terminal 2 in Vancouver and a deep nuclear waste repository in Northern Ontario.

Watch item: the binding conditions document the Major Projects Office is due to publish within 12 months of listing, and the shipper commitments round that will sit alongside it.

via ipolitics.ca (Original)

Filed under

  • pacific-link-pipeline
  • canadian-crude-oil
  • pipeline-permitting
  • oilsands
  • building-canada-act
Share this article:

More from Daniel Okafor

Daniel Okafor

Show full bio

Market editor covering consumer brands and retail at Rig & Refinery.

335 articles

Adjoining reports

« Previous articleNext article »